<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="archive">gsminmag</journal-id>
<journal-title>Mineralogical Magazine</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">Mineralogical Magazine</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0026-461X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Mineralogical Society</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1180/minmag.1990.054.376.09</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Petrology and Experimental Studies</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>The Lundy Granite: A Geochemical and Petrogenetic Comparison with Hercynian and Tertiary Granites</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stone</surname>
<given-names>Maurice</given-names>
</name>
<aff>Earth Resources Centre, University of Exeter, North Park Road, Exeter EX4 4QE</aff></contrib></contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>9</month>
<year>1990</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>54</volume>
<issue>376</issue>
<fpage>431</fpage>
<lpage>446</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>19</day>
<month>7</month>
<year>1989</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>22</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>1989</year>
</date></history>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 1990, The Mineralogical Society</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>1990</copyright-year>
<abstract>
<title>Abstract</title>
<p>New chemical data show that the two main granite types (G1 and G2) cannot be discriminated, but that microgranite sheets/dykes (G3) are significantly different and more evolved, largely as a result of biotite, accessory mineral, and plagioclase fractionation. The Lundy granite is similar to other Tertiary granites of Scotland and Ireland, in age, setting, possible high-temperature mineralogy, relationship to basic magmatism, and <italic>REE</italic> patterns. These features and a highly evolved chemistry suggest derivation from an unexposed more &#x2018;primitive&#x2019; granite that, in turn, had a basaltic parentage. However, similarities with the nearby S-type Hercynian granites, such as high aluminium saturation index (and normative corundum), high trace alkali, Nb, and F contents, low Zr, and high initial Sr ratio suggest a significant crustal component. The problem is resolved by proposing either mixing of silicic magma derived by strong fractionation of basaltic magma with anatectic magma from a pelitic/semi-pelitic crustal source, or fractionation of basaltic magma heavily contaminated by assimilated crustal material. Both origins would yield the high <italic>REE</italic> contents and fiat <italic>REE</italic> patterns of a &#x2018;primitive&#x2019; granite magma. Fractionation, perhaps of hornblende initially, and later, of biotite and accessory minerals together with feldspars, would produce the small volume of highly fractionated Lundy granite.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<title>Keywords</title>
<kwd>Lundy granite</kwd>
<kwd>geochemistry</kwd>
<kwd>petrogenesis</kwd>
<kwd>Cornubian granite</kwd>
<kwd>Tertiary granite</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
