<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="archive">gsminmag</journal-id>
<journal-title>Mineralogical Magazine</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">Mineralogical Magazine</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0026-461X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Mineralogical Society</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1180/minmag.1982.046.338.03</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>A Discussion of Carbonatite Evolution and Nomenclature, and the Generation of Sodic and Potassic Fenites</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Woolley</surname>
<given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<aff>Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD</aff></contrib></contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>3</month>
<year>1982</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>46</volume>
<issue>338</issue>
<fpage>13</fpage>
<lpage>17</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>26</day>
<month>1</month>
<year>1981</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>28</day>
<month>4</month>
<year>1981</year>
</date></history>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 1982, The Mineralogical Society</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>1982</copyright-year>
<abstract>
<title>Abstract</title>
<p>Possible evolutionary paths of alkali-rich carbonatite magma may be related to the production of sodic and potassic fenites. It is concluded that the latter are generated not from separate Na- and K-rich carbonatites, but by the earlier preferential loss of Na from a sodi-potassic carbonatite magma. Trends of both Fe and Mg enrichment in carbonatites are illustrated from a number of centres, and ascribed to crystal fractionation, although metasomatism may be partly responsible. Current nomenclature of carbonatites is unsatisfactory and a division into s&#x00F6;vites, magnesiocarbonatites and ferrocarbonatites is proposed, based on rock chemistry.</p></abstract>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
