<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="archive">gsminmag</journal-id>
<journal-title>Mineralogical Magazine</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">Mineralogical Magazine</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0026-461X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Mineralogical Society</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1180/minmag.1975.040.312.08</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>On &#x2018;Winchite&#x2019; from the Original Locality at Kajlidongri, India</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nayak</surname>
<given-names>V. K.</given-names>
</name>
<aff>Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, University of Saugar, P.O. Saugar (M.P.), 470-003, India</aff></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leake</surname>
<given-names>Bernard E.</given-names>
</name>
<aff>Department of Geology, The University, Glasgow G12 8QQ</aff></contrib></contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>12</month>
<year>1975</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>40</volume>
<issue>312</issue>
<fpage>395</fpage>
<lpage>399</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>7</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>1974</year>
</date></history>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 1975, The Mineralogical Society</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>1975</copyright-year>
<abstract>
<title>Summary</title>
<p>A new analysis of the violet amphibole from the original locality where winchite came from agrees with another recent analysis in differing substantially from the original winchite composition and is (K<sub>0&#x00B7;17</sub>Na<sub>2&#x00B7;10</sub>Ca<sub>0&#x00B7;23</sub>)(Al<sub>0&#x00B7;19</sub>Ti<sub>0&#x00B7;00</sub>Fe<sup>3</sup><sub>1&#x00B7;27</sub>Fe<sup>2</sup><sub>0&#x00B7;01</sub>Mn<sub>0&#x00B7;07</sub>Mg<sub>3&#x00B7;34</sub>)Si<sub>8&#x00B7;01</sub>O<sub>22&#x00B7;05</sub>(OH)<sub>1&#x00B7;95</sub>. It is essentially a magnesio-arfvedsonite. Although it is possible that the original analysis was unreliable, evidence is given to support the alternative view that there is a wide range of blue alkali and soda calcic amphibole compositions at Kajlidongri and the name winchite should be restricted to compositions between ferri-winchite CaNaMg<sub>5</sub>Fe<sup>3+</sup>Si<sub>8</sub>O<sub>22</sub>(OH,F,Cl)<sub>2</sub> and alumino-winchite CaNaMg<sub>5</sub>Al Si<sub>8</sub>O<sub>22</sub>(OH,F,Cl)<sub>2</sub>. X-ray, density, and optical data on the analysed mineral are given.</p></abstract>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
