<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="archive">gsminmag</journal-id>
<journal-title>Mineralogical Magazine</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">Mineralogical Magazine</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0026-461X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Mineralogical Society</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1180/minmag.1969.037.287.09</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Can Ti<sup>4+</sup> Replace Si<sup>4+</sup> in Silicates?</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hartman</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<aff>Geologisch en Mineralogisch Instituut der Rijksuniversiteit, Garenmarkt 1B, Leiden, Netherlands</aff></contrib></contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>9</month>
<year>1969</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>37</volume>
<issue>287</issue>
<fpage>366</fpage>
<lpage>369</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>2</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>1968</year>
</date></history>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 1969, The Mineralogical Society</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>1969</copyright-year>
<abstract>
<title>Summary</title>
<p>It is argued on crystal-chemical grounds that Si deficiency is compensated by the entering of Al, Fe<sup>3+</sup>, or Ti<sup>4+</sup>, in this order of preference, into tetrahedral sites. It is pointed out that Ti<sup>4+</sup> occurs in tetrahedral coordination in exceptional circumstances only, while Fe<sup>3+</sup> relatively easily takes a tetrahedral coordination.</p></abstract>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
