<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="archive">gsminmag</journal-id>
<journal-title>Mineralogical Magazine</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">Mineralogical Magazine</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0026-461X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Mineralogical Society</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1180/minmag.1966.035.274.02</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>A Comparative Electron-Diffraction Study of Sillimanite and Some Natural and Artificial Mullites</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname>
<given-names>D. G. W.</given-names>
</name> <degrees>M.A., Ph.D., F.G.S.</degrees>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="FN1">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>McConnell</surname>
<given-names>J. D. C.</given-names>
</name> <degrees>M.Sc., M.A., Ph.D.</degrees></contrib>
<aff>Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, Downing Place, Cambridge</aff></contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="present-address" id="FN1"><label>1</label><p>Present address: Department of Geology and Mineralogy, Parks Road, Oxford.</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>6</month>
<year>1966</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>35</volume>
<issue>274</issue>
<fpage>810</fpage>
<lpage>814</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>3</day>
<month>2</month>
<year>1965</year>
</date></history>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 1966, The Mineralogical Society</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>1966</copyright-year>
<abstract>
<title>Summary</title>
<p>Electron-diffraction photographs of some natural and synthetic mullites and a typical sillimanite have been obtained and are interpreted using diffraction data due to Agrell and Smith. The position and diffuseness of mullite reflections (<italic>h</italic>0<italic>l</italic>) with <italic>l</italic> = &#x00BD; have been re-studied. In such reciprocal lattice sections maxima are symmetrically disposed in pairs about the positions of sillimanite reflections with <italic>l</italic> odd. They lie on <italic>a</italic>* rows and show different separations in the specimens studied. These diffraction conditions are closely analogous to those observed in the intermediate plagioclases (paired &#x2018;<italic>e</italic>&#x2019; maxima) and in nepheline, and a similar explanation is envisaged in terms of antiphase domain structure. Intimate association of a mullite-type phase and sillimanite is shown to result from the breakdown of muscovite in a thermal metamorphic aureole, and a chemical analysis of a natural Fe,Ti-bearing mullite from a spinel-mullite buchite in the same aureole, is presented.</p></abstract>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
