<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="archive">gsminmag</journal-id>
<journal-title>Mineralogical Magazine</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">Mineralogical Magazine</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0026-461X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Mineralogical Society</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1180/minmag.1965.035.269.07</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>A Scheme of Cation Distribution in the Amphiboles</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ghose</surname>
<given-names>Subrata</given-names>
</name><degrees>M.Sc., M.S., Ph.D.</degrees>
<aff>Inst. Kristallogr. Petrogr., Eidgen&#x00F6;ssische Technische Hochschule, Sonneggstrasse 5, Z&#x00FC;rich 6, Switzerland</aff></contrib></contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>3</month>
<year>1965</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>35</volume>
<issue>269</issue>
<fpage>46</fpage>
<lpage>54</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>10</day>
<month>1</month>
<year>1964</year>
</date></history>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 1965, The Mineralogical Society</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>1965</copyright-year>
<abstract>
<title>Summary</title>
<p>The four principles governing the cation distribution in various octahedral metal sites in the amphibole structure are: Ionic size&#x2014;the <italic>M</italic><sub>4</sub> position prefers large cations like Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>; charge balance&#x2014;when the <italic>M</italic><sub>4</sub> position is occupied by a monovalent ion, like Na<sup>+</sup>, Li<sup>+</sup>, the neighbouring <italic>M</italic><sub>2</sub> position is occupied by a trivalent ion like Al<sup>3+</sup>, Fe<sup>3+</sup>; role of the strongly polarizing cations&#x2014;cations like Fe<sup>2+</sup> prefer the <italic>M</italic><sub>4</sub> site, since they tend to form covalent bonds with the O<sub>4</sub> oxygens; and the role of the (OH) ions&#x2014;these form part of the brucite layer and repel large or strongly polarizing cations, which tend to distort the regularity of the sheet structure.</p>
<p>The Al-Si distribution in the two different tetrahedral sites are governed by three principles: relief of the Si-O-Si bond strain&#x2014;Al<sup>3+</sup> in the Si<sub>1</sub> site causes fewer Si<sup>4+</sup> cations to share more than two anions with other Si<sup>4+</sup> cations; charge balance&#x2014;with the introduction of alkali ions in the &#x2018;<italic>A</italic>&#x2019; position, Al<sup>3+</sup> is introduced in the Si<sub>1</sub> position, since the coordinating oxygens around the <italic>A</italic> position mostly belong to Si<sub>1</sub>; and steric considerations&#x2014;occupation of the <italic>M</italic><sub>4</sub> site by a large cation tends to rotate the Si<sub>2</sub> tetrahedron anticlockwise; Al<sup>3+</sup> substitution in the Si<sub>1</sub> site rotates the Si<sub>1</sub> tetrahedron clockwise and thus the regularity and the constancy of the repeat distance of the silicate double chain is maintained.</p>
<p>Based on these principles, a scheme of cation distribution in the <italic>M</italic><sub>1</sub>, <italic>M</italic><sub>2</sub>, <italic>M</italic><sub>3</sub>, <italic>M</italic><sub>4</sub>, <italic>A</italic>, Si<sub>1</sub>, and Si<sub>2</sub> positions in the amphibole structure has been derived for most of the common amphibole varieties, except richterite, whose position is anomalous from a crystallochemical point of view.</p></abstract>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
