<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="archive">gsminmag</journal-id>
<journal-title>Mineralogical Magazine</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">Mineralogical Magazine</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0026-461X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Mineralogical Society</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1180/minmag.1965.034.268.24</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>The Metamorphic Facies Concept</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>St J. Lambert</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<aff>Department of Geology and Mineralogy, Oxford</aff></contrib></contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<year>1965</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>34</volume>
<issue>268</issue>
<fpage>283</fpage>
<lpage>291</lpage>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 1965, The Mineralogical Society</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>1965</copyright-year>
<abstract>
<title>Summary</title>
<p>Present-day facies schemes are reviewed in relation to their definitions and applicability: a simplification is proposed based on assemblages in basaltic rocks, with secondary facies defined subsequently on pelitic assemblages.</p></abstract>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
