<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="archive">gsminmag</journal-id>
<journal-title>Mineralogical Magazine</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">Mineralogical Magazine</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0026-461X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Mineralogical Society</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1180/minmag.1965.034.268.11</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>The Kyanite Isograd in Glen Clova, Angus, Scotland</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chinner</surname>
<given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<aff>Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, Cambridge University</aff></contrib></contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<year>1965</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>34</volume>
<issue>268</issue>
<fpage>132</fpage>
<lpage>143</lpage>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 1965, The Mineralogical Society</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>1965</copyright-year>
<abstract>
<title>Summary</title>
<p>Mineral data from Glen Clova, Angus, suggest that the development of kyanite in graphite-bearing staurolite mica-schists, treated in terms of a Ca-free system, involved decrease of staurolite and a decrease in biotite MgO:FeO ratio. A kyanite isograd may be defined in Glen Clova as the locality where kyanite joins the assemblage staurolite-garnet-biotite-muscovite-plagioclase-quartz-graphite, the biotite having mol. <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>MgO</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>MgO</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x002B;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>FeO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&#x003D;</mml:mo><mml:mn>51</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x00B7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, although the persistence of this identical assemblage over some 600 metres introduces some uncertainty of interpretation. It is suggested that the reaction staurolite+quartz &#x2192; garnet+kyanite is unlikely to be a common reaction in nature and that its use to subdivide the am-phibolite facies is unjustified.</p></abstract>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
