<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="archive">gsminmag</journal-id>
<journal-title>Mineralogical Magazine</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">Mineralogical Magazine</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0026-461X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Mineralogical Society</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1180/minmag.1963.033.263.08</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>The Recalculation of Amphibole Analyses</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Phillips</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name> <degrees>B.Sc.</degrees>
<aff>Department of Geology, University of Durham</aff></contrib></contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>12</month>
<year>1963</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>33</volume>
<issue>263</issue>
<fpage>701</fpage>
<lpage>711</lpage>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 1963, The Mineralogical Society</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>1963</copyright-year>
<abstract>
<title>Summary</title>
<p>A good chemical analysis of an amphibole will give cation numbers that can be correlated in detail with the available lattice positions. The substitions that must be recognized are described. A more rigorous check of the analytical results becomes possible and the sources of error may be indicated.</p></abstract>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
