<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="archive">gsminmag</journal-id>
<journal-title>Mineralogical Magazine</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">Mineralogical Magazine</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0026-461X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Mineralogical Society</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1180/minmag.1960.032.250.05</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>The Biaxial Ray Surface</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tocher</surname>
<given-names>F. E.</given-names>
</name><degrees>B.Sc., Ph.D.</degrees>
<aff>Dept. of Geology and Mineralogy, University of Aberdeen.</aff></contrib></contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>9</month>
<year>1960</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>32</volume>
<issue>250</issue>
<fpage>558</fpage>
<lpage>566</lpage>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 1960, The Mineralogical Society</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>1960</copyright-year>
<abstract>
<title>Summary</title>
<p>Existing descriptions of the biaxial ray surface are, in general, misleading. A more accurate description, stressing the simplicity of the surface, is proposed and this is supported by numerous sections drawn through or near the singular points.</p></abstract>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
