<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="archive">gsminmag</journal-id>
<journal-title>Mineralogical Magazine</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">Mineralogical Magazine</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0026-461X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Mineralogical Society</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1180/minmag.1957.31.239.02</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>An Investigation of Two New Minerals: Rhodesite and Mountainite</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gard</surname>
<given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name><degrees>B.Sc., Ph.D.</degrees></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname>
<given-names>H. F. W.</given-names>
</name><degrees>D.Sc., Ph.D.</degrees></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chalmers</surname>
<given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name><degrees>B.Sc., Ph.D.</degrees></contrib>
<aff>Department of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen</aff></contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>12</month>
<year>1957</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>31</volume>
<issue>239</issue>
<fpage>611</fpage>
<lpage>623</lpage>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 1957, The Mineralogical Society</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>1957</copyright-year>
<abstract>
<title>Summary</title>
<p>Rhodesite, from Kimberley, S. Africa, has been examined by electron-microscope, X-ray, and other methods. The acicular crystals are orthorhombic, with <italic>a</italic> 23&#x00B7;8, <italic>b</italic> 6&#x00B7;54, <italic>c</italic> 7&#x00B7;05 &#x00C5;.; elongation <italic>c</italic>, cleavage (100); unit-cell contents approximately (Ca,Na<sub>2</sub>,K<sub>2</sub>)<sub>8</sub>Si<sub>16</sub>O<sub>40</sub>.11H<sub>2</sub>O; optical properties <italic>&#x03B1;</italic> 1&#x00B7;502, <italic>&#x03B2;</italic> 1&#x00B7;505, &#x03B3; 1&#x00B7;515; <italic>&#x03B1;</italic> = <italic>b</italic>, <italic>&#x03B2;</italic> = <italic>&#x03B1;</italic>, <italic>&#x03B3;</italic> = <italic>c</italic>. With it occurs a similar but distinct fibrous mineral, which appears to be a new species for which the name <italic>mountainite</italic> is proposed; it is monoclinic, with <italic>a</italic> 13&#x00B7;51, <italic>b</italic> 13&#x00B7;10, <italic>c</italic> 13&#x00B7;51 &#x00C5;., <italic>&#x03B2;</italic> 104&#x00B0; elongation <italic>b</italic>, cleavage (001); unit-cell contents approximately (Ca,Na<sub>2</sub>,K<sub>2</sub>)<sub>16</sub>Si<sub>32</sub>O<sub>80</sub>.24H<sub>2</sub>O; optical properties <italic>&#x03B1;</italic> 1&#x00B7;504, <italic>&#x03B2;</italic> 1&#x00B7;510, <italic>&#x03B3;</italic> 1&#x00B7;519; <italic>&#x03B2;</italic> = <italic>b</italic> (elongation). Both rhodesite and mountainite show close similarities to the fibrous zeolites, mountainite in particular resembling thomsonite. The possible structural basis of these similarities is discussed.</p></abstract>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
