<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="archive">gsminmag</journal-id>
<journal-title>Mineralogical Magazine</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">Mineralogical Magazine</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0026-461X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Mineralogical Society</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1180/minmag.1956.031.232.02</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Okenite and Nekoite (A New Mineral)</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gard</surname>
<given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <degrees>B.Sc.</degrees></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname>
<given-names>H. F. W.</given-names></name> <degrees>B.Sc., Ph.D.</degrees></contrib>
<aff>Department of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen</aff></contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>3</month>
<year>1956</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>31</volume>
<issue>232</issue>
<fpage>5</fpage>
<lpage>20</lpage>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 1956, The Mineralogical Society</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>1956</copyright-year>
<abstract>
<title>Summary</title>
<p>The unit cell of okenite (CaO.2SiO<sub>2</sub>.2H<sub>2</sub>O) has been determined for a specimen from Bombay, India, using a combination of X-ray, electron-microscope, and electron-diffraction methods. It is anorthic with<sup>1</sup> <italic>a</italic> 9&#x00B7;84, <italic>b</italic> 7&#x00B7;20, <italic>c</italic> 21&#x00B7;33&#x00C5;., <italic>&#x03B1;</italic> 90&#x00B7;0&#x00B0;, <italic>&#x03B2;</italic> 103&#x00B7;9&#x00B0;, <italic>&#x03B3;</italic>, 111&#x00B7;5&#x00B0;, elongation <italic>b</italic>, Z 9. These data are compatible with the goniometric results of Boggild (1922) and allow the latter to be interpreted.</p>
<p>A specimen from Crestmore, California, which Eakle (1917) had described as okenite, was also examined. It was found to be a new species, having the same composition as okenite but distinguishable from it by its optical properties, X-ray powder data, and unit cell. The latter is anorthic with<sup>1</sup> <italic>a</italic> 7&#x00B7;60, <italic>b</italic> 7&#x00B7;32, <italic>c</italic> 9&#x00B7;86 &#x00C5;, <italic>&#x03B1;</italic> 111&#x00B0; 48&#x2032;, <italic>&#x03B2;</italic> 86&#x00B0; 12&#x2032;, <italic>&#x03B3;</italic> 103&#x00B0; 54&#x2032;, elongation <italic>b</italic>, Z = 3. Because of the relation to okenite, the name <italic>nekoite</italic> is suggested.</p></abstract>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
