<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="archive">gsminmag</journal-id>
<journal-title>Mineralogical Magazine</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="full">Mineralogical Magazine</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0026-461X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Mineralogical Society</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1180/minmag.1922.019.98.04</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Ninth List of New Mineral Names<xref ref-type="fn" rid="FN1">1</xref></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Spencer</surname>
<given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name><degrees>M.A., Sc.D., F.G.S.</degrees>
<aff>Assistant-Keeper in the Mineral Department of the British Museam</aff></contrib></contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="other" id="FN1"><label>1</label><p>Previous lists of this series have been given at the ends of vols. 11&#x2013;18 (1897&#x2013; 1919) of this Magazine. The present list duplicates to a certain extent the information already given in <italic>Mineralogical Abstracts</italic> under the heading &#x2018;New Minerals.&#x2019; The matter is, however, here presented, for purposes of reference, as a dictionary list of new mineral-names, rather than as a list of alleged-new minerals. Unfortunately for the science, neither of these would correspond at all closely with a critical list of genuinely-new minerals.</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>9</month>
<year>1922</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>19</volume>
<issue>98</issue>
<fpage>334</fpage>
<lpage>354</lpage>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 1922, The Mineralogical Society</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>1922</copyright-year>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
